According to @ai_9684xtpa, the verified capital invested in WLFI is 15M rather than 7M, correcting earlier figures and providing more accurate context for position sizing and market depth assessments (source: @ai_9684xtpa on X). According to @ai_9684xtpa, a list of the top 10 individual WLFI holders and their cost basis has been shared for review, enabling traders to track whale concentration and reference cost levels in on-chain analysis (source: @ai_9684xtpa on X).

According to @ai_9684xtpa, 6.55 billion WLFI have moved into the Lockbox contract since it opened at 03:57 today, representing 6.55% of the total token supply (source: @ai_9684xtpa). According to @ai_9684xtpa, the inflow occurred within roughly five and a half hours, implying an average deposit pace of about 1.19 billion WLFI per hour based on the reported figures (source: @ai_9684xtpa). According to @ai_9684xtpa, at the contract’s current price, the deposits are valued near $1.5 billion, implying an estimated WLFI price of roughly $0.229 derived from the stated totals (source: @ai_9684xtpa). According to @ai_9684xtpa, two of the top 10 individual holders (TOP1 and TOP8) have completed transfers to the Lockbox, with a contract portal link provided by the source (source: @ai_9684xtpa). According to @ai_9684xtpa, the reported 6.55% equals 6.55 billion, indicating an estimated total WLFI supply of about 100 billion based on the source data (source: @ai_9684xtpa).

According to @ai_9684xtpa, the second largest individual or institutional holder of TRUMP token has recently increased their holdings by withdrawing 307,000 TRUMP (worth $3.1 million) from OKX exchange. The combined holdings at addresses 69P4R...BhYLQ and 2p63s...ePVxu now total 2,424,094 TRUMP, valued at approximately $24.67 million. The average cost basis for these tokens is $10.19, which is nearly equal to the current market price. The gap between the second largest and the top holder has narrowed to just 245,000 tokens, indicating significant whale accumulation and potential for increased market volatility. This activity is closely watched by traders for possible price movements in TRUMP.

According to @ai_9684xtpa, an analysis of the Strategic Ethereum Reserve reveals the top institutional holders of Ethereum (ETH). The Ethereum Foundation is the largest holder with 243,000 ETH. Following the foundation is SharpLink Gaming, described as an Ethereum-equivalent of MicroStrategy, holding 205,000 ETH. The third-largest holder identified is PulseChain Sac with 166,000 ETH. For traders, monitoring the wallets of these major entities, or 'whales', is critical as their transactions can significantly impact ETH's market price and liquidity. The source notes, however, that this list is likely not exhaustive and only includes a partial set of known entities.

According to Milk Road, Solana's (SOL) top holders list now includes several unexpected institutional and individual names, as detailed in their June 20, 2025 report. This shift in ownership concentration could signal changing market sentiment and potential new sources of liquidity or volatility for SOL traders. Notably, the presence of new large holders may impact price stability and trading strategies, particularly for short-term and swing traders monitoring whale activity. The report also highlights that tracking these new players can offer valuable insights for anticipating large transactions and potential market moves. Source: Milk Road (milkroad.com/daily/top-7-pu...).

According to Bubblemaps on Twitter, before the launch of ZEUS (0x0f7), over 15 top holders were funded through Union and 35 holders via Changenow. These wallets and their associated clusters collectively control 49% of the total token supply (source: Bubblemaps, May 28, 2025). This concentrated ownership significantly increases the risk of price volatility and potential sell-offs, making it crucial for crypto traders to closely monitor large wallet activity and associated on-chain movements for ZEUS.

According to Bubblemaps, before the launch of $ZEUS (0x4d4), 49 top holders were funded through Union chain and 7 top holders through Changenow. Combined, these wallets and their associated clusters control 63% of the total token supply (source: Bubblemaps, May 28, 2025). For traders, this high concentration among a small group raises concerns about potential price volatility and liquidity risks. Monitoring these wallets is critical for short-term and long-term trading strategies, as any movement could significantly impact $ZEUS price action and market sentiment.

According to Ai 姨 (@ai_9684xtpa), the top individual holder of $SOON token is currently on the Solana network, with BSC network holdings not included in this ranking (source: Twitter). For traders, this concentration of $SOON on Solana suggests Solana-based liquidity and price movement may be more significant than on Binance Smart Chain. Monitoring Solana wallet activity and large transfers could provide actionable trading signals, as major holders' actions could impact short-term price volatility and market depth.

According to Lookonchain, a long-term $TRUMP liquidity provider strategically moved 211,977 $TRUMP (valued at $2.76 million) and 18,376 $SOL (also valued at $2.76 million) from two wallets, catapulting them into the top 220 holders. This move potentially secures them invitations to the exclusive $TRUMP dinner, which could influence future trading dynamics. Traders should monitor these wallets for further activity as they could impact $TRUMP's market liquidity and volatility.

According to The Kobeissi Letter, President Trump's memecoin, $TRUMP, experienced a significant surge of up to 65% following his announcement that the top 220 holders will be invited to have dinner with him. This development has sparked increased trading activity and interest in the memecoin market, particularly among those looking to capitalize on the potential for exclusive experiences tied to cryptocurrency holdings.

According to Glassnode, the supply of $OM held by the top 1% has decreased from approximately 96.4% to 95.6% right before a market crash. This change, although not the largest in recent months, indicates a potential redistribution of assets by large holders or the occurrence of liquidation events. This data does not include assets held in centralized exchanges (CEX), team, or contract wallets, suggesting significant movements among individual large holders.